* Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> [2005-09-02 17:40]:
> And especially if you could organize it something along the
> line of my proposal, or explain to me what isn't good about
> that. No discussion on that after my pitch. :(

I just don’t currently see a way to cleanly implement the design
I want using that approach, so I’ve fallen back to my usual
stance that solving the problem a couple of times over and then
extracting abstractions from code is better than designing in the

Of course I haven’t helped that along either, since I haven’t put
my code anywhere yet…

PS.: merlyn, your mailer is misconfigured. It’s sending UTF-8,
but the headers claim it’s UTF-16BE. The end result is that your
mail literally looked like a bunch of chinese. I was surprised
for a moment…

Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
cgi-prototype-users mailing list

Reply via email to