* Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> [2005-09-02 17:40]: > And especially if you could organize it something along the > line of my proposal, or explain to me what isn't good about > that. No discussion on that after my pitch. :(
I just don’t currently see a way to cleanly implement the design I want using that approach, so I’ve fallen back to my usual stance that solving the problem a couple of times over and then extracting abstractions from code is better than designing in the abstract. Of course I haven’t helped that along either, since I haven’t put my code anywhere yet… PS.: merlyn, your mailer is misconfigured. It’s sending UTF-8, but the headers claim it’s UTF-16BE. The end result is that your mail literally looked like a bunch of chinese. I was surprised for a moment… Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
