* Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> [2005-08-11 17:20]:
> If you are thinking that the release currently called
> CGI-Prototype should be altered, we can talk about making the
> changes directly there.

Well, kinda; I was hoping to start refactoring ::Hidden into bits
that can be reused in ::PathInfo and others and those which
can’t. ::PathInfo could then be separate or be part of the
distro, but that’s a different issue.

I’d like to know your thoughts on this; see my previous, more
detailed mail.

> Let's settle on the naming first... :)

We need to sort out the structure first; do you agree with my
assessment that the state-to-class mapper can be reused by state
deductors, but vice versa does not work so well?

I used ::Simple for the mapper in ::Hidden which ::PathInfo would
reuse, but I’m not wedded to that name at all.

Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
cgi-prototype-users mailing list

Reply via email to