* Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> [2005-08-11 17:20]: > If you are thinking that the release currently called > CGI-Prototype should be altered, we can talk about making the > changes directly there.
Well, kinda; I was hoping to start refactoring ::Hidden into bits that can be reused in ::PathInfo and others and those which can’t. ::PathInfo could then be separate or be part of the distro, but that’s a different issue. I’d like to know your thoughts on this; see my previous, more detailed mail. > Let's settle on the naming first... :) We need to sort out the structure first; do you agree with my assessment that the state-to-class mapper can be reused by state deductors, but vice versa does not work so well? I used ::Simple for the mapper in ::Hidden which ::PathInfo would reuse, but I’m not wedded to that name at all. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
