On 2004-09-23, Christopher Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Sam Tregar wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>>> Why Arch?
>>> http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/WhyArch
>
> We've been using subversion here for the last couple of months and we've
> been quite pleased. Arch looks intersting, but particularly with the
> existance of the "svk" module I feel subvserion is much more interesting
> to Perl aficianados.
Subversion, along with Arch, appears to be the two most interesting
solutions I see people moving to from CVS. I understand that Subversion
is: "like CVS, only better", while Arch has more fundamental
differences, which appeal to me. Now I'm using Arch to manage 6 (small)
projects and have been pleased.
Arch is very easy to install, and the most basic commands are the same as cvs:
"update", "commit", etc. (I understand the same is true for Subversion).
Mark
--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark Stosberg Principal Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Summersault, LLC
765-939-9301 ext 202 database driven websites
. . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
