Hi Mark, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>Django. >Ruby on Rails. >Catalyst. >CGI::Application. > >Three web framework project names and a module name. > >We need a project name. One that I can say to my significant other >without untangling an acronym. > >CGI::Application is a fine module name, but we need a better project >name. > > This subject came up a few months ago but I don't think there were too many suggestions. I agree that we need something a little catchier than a CPAN module name. >There's "CAP", which shows up an acronym already for >"CGI::Application::Plugin::". > > > At least this gives us a starting point. >It could just as well stand for "CGI::Application and its Plugins". :) > >Still, "CAP" is acronym with no pizazz on its own. Maybe there is a >foundation there, though. We could conqueror an image of a wizard's cap, >or maybe the captain of a ship..... > >Maybe there is a adjective out there to turn it into a complete name-- >"Fast CAP".... not catchy, I know. > >However, I think if a new project name is too different, it will just >create confusion. > >Think about it. Better ideas? > > Mark > > > esCAPade :) David --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
