> From: Rob Kinyon > Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 07:07 > > > I don't get it. From my reading of the threads, no one is changing > > CGI::Application, right? They're just building extra > functionality in > > 3rd party modules which people may find useful, but which you can > > choose to ignore if you wish. For instance, I use regularly use > > C::A::Dispatch, C::A::P::Session and C::A::P::DevPopUp, but > why should > > anyone care if people make use of such additional modules - even if > > someone writes a super-duper plugin to handle dispatches and query > > parameters? > > My proposal in this thread is more radical than that. I'm > proposing that CA becomes a pipeline with a set of default > implementations for each step along the way. That way, you > can customize the CA pipeline to perform exactly what you > want to do when you want it to happen. That's what Jesse et > al are objecting to. > > Rob > Oh, in that case, maybe a new framework is in order - CGI::Application::PlusPlus anyone?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
