On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:18:42 -0500 Cees Hek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...excellent explanation snipped...] > So I don't think Rob is talking about changing the whole philosophy of > CGI::Application, he is just talking about refactoring some bloated > methods into smaller pieces (which is generally considered a good > thing). Cees, thank you for this most excellent post - it makes everything *much* clearer! I think I misinterpreted this "Everything is a Plugin" idea to be something much more abstract and general purpose, e.g. mucking about with the dispatcher or the execution pipeline in highly flexible ways. But that's obviously not the intent here. Splitting out 'run' or other monolithic parts of C::A into self-contained, single-purpose bits is clearly a good thing. Longer term, I can also imagine how making some of these bits pluggable would also be useful. Michael --- Michael Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
