Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > Is there any actual point to this change? Do we have plans to support > alternate inheritence hierarchies for CGI::Application? Have any such been > tested or planned? > > This isn't a "hey, Class::MOP is the new hotness!" change, is it?
I think this was a "hey, Class::MOP is really cool. I bet it would make CGI::App much simpler...oh wait. Look how slow everything got!". And now we also have "Look how big everything got!". -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
