On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Michael Peters wrote:
Just a word of warning about C::A::P::Apache. The idea was that $self->query would return an Apache::Request object instead of a CGI.pm object. This would make things faster and use less memory. But so many other C::A plugins assume that $self->query is a CGI.pm object that if you use CAP::Apache with other plugins things break in weird ways. So, as the author of CAP::Apache, I'd warn against using it if you want to use any other C::A plugins. If you just want to use it by itself, it should be fine though.
Well that sucks. Which plugins are broken? Now that with Titanium, CGI::Application is trying to be a full framework instead of just a bunch of modules, shouldn't bugs be filed against plugins that dont do the right thing?
-- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
