Hi Jaldhar On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 10:55 -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Michael Peters wrote: > > > Just a word of warning about C::A::P::Apache. The idea was that > > $self->query > > would return an Apache::Request object instead of a CGI.pm object. This > > would > > make things faster and use less memory. But so many other C::A plugins > > assume > > that $self->query is a CGI.pm object that if you use CAP::Apache with other > > plugins things break in weird ways. So, as the author of CAP::Apache, I'd > > warn against using it if you want to use any other C::A plugins. If you > > just > > want to use it by itself, it should be fine though. > > > > Well that sucks. Which plugins are broken? Now that with Titanium, > CGI::Application is trying to be a full framework instead of just a bunch > of modules, shouldn't bugs be filed against plugins that dont do the right > thing?
We need to /always/ make the effort to submit bug reports. -- Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
