Hi Ben
> I note that in the Plugin::DBH code there is no eval{} around the
> ping... I will probably try that.
>
> First I am going to try what I have with just connect() instead of
> connect_cached.. I am wondering if the dual layer of $dbh checking is
> causing system to get confused. I agree oracle connections are
> slow... but the FastCGI version of this page takes 3 seconds WHEN
> CACHED... so I am not really worried about it (will profile it though)
I'm confused.
If you use Apache::DBI then what's the point of using
CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH?
And at the same time, why use FastCGI? I tried it, and it worked for
sure, but I prefer to use CGI::Application::Dispatch, with the latter
wearing its 'mod_perl handler' hat.
If you are in a position to compile Apache and mod_perl, then mod_perl
via C::A::Dispatch is surely the way to go.
And if you can't compile them, then perhaps it's time to ask for our
help on how to do that :-).
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
