On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:55:58 +0000 Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lyle wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was wondering if there were reasons why cgi-app shouldn't try to > > use HTML::Template::Pro (if available) over HTML::Template by default? > > One of the main selling points of cgi-app for me is it's speed under > > normal cgi. Considering HTML::Template::Pro's speed gains I would have > > thought this would be preference? > > Oops, just read:- > http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Template-Pro/lib/HTML/Template/PerlInterface.pod#DISTINCTIONS_AND_INCOMPATIBILITIES > Seems they aren't 100% compatible. That, and I've never noticed HTML::Template to be the bottleneck for a web application. If anything is slow, it's usually a complex, large, or unoptimizeda database query in my case. Besides, we just added the 'html_tmpl_class' method to make it incredibly easy to use a different HTML::Template-like replacement. Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
