Mark Stosberg wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:55:58 +0000
Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
Lyle wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if there were reasons why cgi-app shouldn't try to
use HTML::Template::Pro (if available) over HTML::Template by default?
One of the main selling points of cgi-app for me is it's speed under
normal cgi. Considering HTML::Template::Pro's speed gains I would have
thought this would be preference?
Oops, just read:-
http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Template-Pro/lib/HTML/Template/PerlInterface.pod#DISTINCTIONS_AND_INCOMPATIBILITIES
Seems they aren't 100% compatible.
That, and I've never noticed HTML::Template to be the bottleneck for a web
application. If anything is slow, it's usually a complex, large, or
unoptimizeda database query in my case.
Besides, we just added the 'html_tmpl_class' method to make it incredibly easy
to use a different HTML::Template-like replacement.
I know. I found that feature the other day when looking to use
HTML::Template::Set. Not having to update all my template code to use it
put a big smile on my face :)
Lyle
Mark
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################
