> I would agree that CGI::App is a bit generic and often confusing. I'm > not sure I care for the name of Titanium. > > How about 'Mantle'? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl, > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(geology) > > A couple of positive meanings, easy to say and type, short and not > used much beyond geology.
Perhaps more effort should have gone into the name-brainstorm process six months ago, before Titanium 1.0 was released: http://search.cpan.org/~markstos/Titanium-1.00/ Is there a sense that Titanium is so bad that we should re-brand at this point? I agree there may be better names out there, but at some point we have to commit and move on. Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
