Hi Michal On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:16 -0400, Michael Peters wrote: > Michael Peters wrote: > > > My biggest beef with Titanium is the name. It has these problems: > > Another reason to not use it: It's already been taken. > http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/titanium
That reminds me. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious (approx) is taken too :). But I'm joking. That word became famous years ago, so the argument that titanium is not good because it's 4 syllables long is irrational. It's not the length that's the problem. It's the connotations, and the context which matter. -- Ron Savage [email protected] http://savage.net.au/index.html ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
