Hi Puneet On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:20 -0500, P Kishor wrote:
> To me, C::A::P::Routes seems more in the spirit of CGI::Application > than C::A::D is, and I would rather use Routes, but something needs to > be changed somewhere for it to work properly. This is very personal view. I find CGI::Application::Dispatch just marvellous. I have read the docs for C::A::P::Router several times, but I can see nothing there which induces me to switch. This, too, is a personal view :-). -- Ron Savage [email protected] http://savage.net.au/index.html ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
