On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Ron Savage<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Puneet > > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:20 -0500, P Kishor wrote: > >> To me, C::A::P::Routes seems more in the spirit of CGI::Application >> than C::A::D is, and I would rather use Routes, but something needs to >> be changed somewhere for it to work properly. > > This is very personal view. > > I find CGI::Application::Dispatch just marvellous.
I too find CAD pretty good. I find CAPR more in the spirit of CgiApp, as a plugin in the base class rather than as an add on to the instance script. Since CAPR is almost 90% based on CAD, it retains all that is good about CAD, and yet, is simpler to implement, except for the issue that I am having. In any case, at the very most, it is just one more wtdi. > > I have read the docs for C::A::P::Router several times, but I can see > nothing there which induces me to switch. > > This, too, is a personal view :-). > > -- > Ron Savage > [email protected] > http://savage.net.au/index.html > > > -- Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science ======================================================================= Sent from Madison, WI, United States ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
