On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mark Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I personally loathe Perl sites that use PHP. > > I used to feel guilty about what others would think if they knew I > edited Perl with a non-Perl editor.
I don't think the analogy is quite right. We're talking about a Perl web application design tool. If the website for it doesn't have some kind of demo and in fact uses mostly PHP code, what good is the lib. Maybe I should go look at PHP instead. No, really, this is an important point. Look at http://jquery.com/ , http://flowplayer.org/ , http://www.phpbb.com/ , http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki , http://rubyonrails.org/ , http://www.web-app.net/ , etc. I think it's important that the website selling a website tool at least demo the product it pretends to be selling. (Strictly speaking, I'm not so sure the RoR site is in RoR... how could I tell?) -- If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming. 114 jumps, 47.2 minutes of freefall, 90.4 freefall miles. ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
