On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Look at www.yabbforum.com, it's a Perl forum script, but it's site is in > php. I've contacted them about this before, to be told I wasn't the > first to bring it up.
I agree with you guys. But, first it was loathing a Perl site that uses PHP. Then it was a web-development library site using a forum or wiki not developed with that. Now it's a forum site using a different forum. I think that's my point too. It's a matter of degrees, not absolutes. Different levels of apparent contradiction. Balancing goals which may be contradictory (David's goal to encourage greater participation and reduce spam, while making editing easy may be diminished by a goal to treat everything as an opportunity to showcase C::A, however lightweight and featureless the result may be.). I was just saying that if David's goals are important, then a robust forum and wiki would be the way to go. Even in the most contradictory case of a forum (or wiki) site using a different forum (or wiki), I think that could be justified if the forum (or wiki) hasn't reached the desired state of development. Using something better to facilitate that development seems like a mature position. Not necessarily discrediting. (IMO.). Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
