Am 19.07.2010 16:31, schrieb P Kishor: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Dietrich Streifert > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I'm currently using speedy_cgi as a persistent perl process and wanted >> to test if fcgi would be an option for me. >> > I am curious as to why you want to shift from SpeedyCGI to FastCGI if > the former is already giving you a persistent perl process and the > consequent speed advantages. > > There are so many persistent perl methods out there now that I would > love to see an exhaustive comparison of them. >
The main reason is that speedy_cgi is rock solid, but the last official release of speedy_cgi is version 2.22 dated Oct 2003. During my last main install of speedy_cgi on opensuse 11 x64 I already had to collect a few patches here and there to compile speedy_cgi on that platform along with/for perl 5.10 ( http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-perl/SpeedyCGI?arches=all ). Having a second persistent technology right to my hands gives me a migration path in case that I'm not able to compile speedy_cgi for the the next perl release or os realease. The other way I'm fully satisfied with speedy_cgi. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Dietrich Streifert -- Visionet GmbH Firmensitz: Am Weichselgarten 7, 91058 Erlangen Registergericht: Handelsregister Fürth, HRB 6573 Geschäftsführer: Stefan Lindner ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
