Brett Sanger wrote: > > Because databases don't store arrays? Postgres does support arrays, and I suspect some others do too. This was part of the "Object Relational" database movement which never took off. I'm not a personal fan of this feature and haven't used it yet myself.
> As I said, putting the permissions into databases is more powerful, > but sometimes the above is easier to maintain than a table of permissions, > a table of users, a table of which users are in which groups, a table of > what permissions each group has, etc. As someone who once when down the road of using all those tables to store access information, I have to agree. :) And here's some documention of a recent spring day "at the office": http://mark.stosberg.com/About/Currents/2002/spring_fever_juggling.swf http://mark.stosberg.com/Skate/Photos/hip_ollie_large.jpg -mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
