On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Stefan Naewe <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Stefan Naewe <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> > But github should by no means become a primary place for the repo. I > >> > don't take pull requests. > >> > >> Why not ? > > > > > > Because that is not the purpose of cgit. > > What is not the purpose of cgit ? > Being maintained by pull requests from github ? > I really don't understand what you are talking about here. > > > I will not argue this; it is not up for debate. Please don't bother > replying > > to this email. > > Am I the only one who thinks that this doesn't sound too friendly ? > > Im a little bit puzzled about Jason's reaction. > > Not really. cgit is maintained by a patch-based workflow. I don't blame him for choosing to keep this workflow. I would prefer to submit patches, and discuss them on the mailing list. > Stefan > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > python -c "print > '73746566616e2e6e6165776540676d61696c2e636f6d'.decode('hex')" > > _______________________________________________ > cgit mailing list > [email protected] > http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit > _______________________________________________ cgit mailing list [email protected] http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
