On 15/01/13 21:22, Džen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Stefan Naewe <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
What is not the purpose of cgit ?
Being maintained by pull requests from github ?
I really don't understand what you are talking about here.

It wouldn't make sense to use github as a web-interface for the cgit
project because the sole purpose of cgit is already to provide a web
interface for git repositories. So if you host everything at github,
there's no reason for cgit to exist anymore.

Am I the only one who thinks that this doesn't sound too friendly ?

Im a little bit puzzled about Jason's reaction.

Yes, you are the only one. This whole github-is-the-best hipster
attitude is getting on my nerves.

Who said anything about that?

Me, I didn't even imply it.
I implied that it has better uptime and less bandwidth limits.
That's all

--
Ferry Huberts

_______________________________________________
cgit mailing list
[email protected]
http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit

Reply via email to