Heikki Toivonen wrote:
I think what you are thinking/proposing is that John redoes the
incremental wx changes on the trunk, checkin things in as he goes.
Yes, that's what I was proposing (or some variation of it) because I
thought he couldn't repro the whole set of failures on his machines.
Apparently, I was mistaken so, yes indeed, having him do the tests on
his own set of machines is much better.
However, I don't think this is a good idea for a few reasons:
* First of all, if we did this we wouldn't need the wx39 branch at all
* If we did this, it would make it more difficult to test the alpha2
fixes (we'd have to wait until all wx issues are fixed)
* Redoing the old checkins is error prone
Agree with all that but if the FT failures were only seen on the
Tinderboxes, I don't see how else we could do. Anyway, since is a moot
point since I was wrong in my assumption.
Conclusion: I agree with your plan Heikki. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Cheers,
- Philippe
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
