Andi Vajda wrote: > My preference is neither. We should document which compilers are known > to work so that developers who want reliability know what to work with.
I don't see how this could work. Any code change could cause the build to break under some previously "known to work" compiler. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
