+1 for a "chandler-users" mailing list.
Reid
On Dec 27, 2006, at 22:08, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Hi Andre,
Aha! I didn't understand that you meant a mailing list for dogfooders.
I agree with you that a community of technically skilled users/
dogfooders helping out other users/dogfooders would be a real asset
to the project. It is indeed frustrating to have a bug parked at
"works for me" when the bug still occurs for the person dogfooding
-- I can see how a forum for discussing the bug would be helpful.
You bring up a good point that we have a window of a few months to
think through the mechanics about how we'll support early adopters.
Anyone else have 2c on whether now is the time to start up such a
list, in advance of Preview?
Anything else that would be helpful in establishing such a
community? We weren't really ready for that in the past, but
Chandler is now stable enough that we can start pushing on that as
a goal.
Is "works for me" the right resolution for bugs the developers
can't reproduce but we know happen for end users? If not, how
should we handle these bugs? (Mail bugs in particular seem prone to
this kind of situation).
Cheers,
Katie
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
