Philippe, thank you for your feedback. See my comments inline for the
Email test spec.
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:03 PM, Philippe Bossut wrote:
Thanks Dan for writing these. Very good.
Details on each test plan here under.
Email Test Spec
http://svn.osafoundation.org/docs/trunk/testspecs/rel0_7/Email-0.7-
testspec.html
TC0005: What are the "Forward fields" mentioned in the tests?
It means
1. Fwd: is prepended to the Title
2. Begin forwarded event: to the top of the Notes field
Updated the spec to add the details.
TC0021: An email with an event received in Chandler from an other
Chandler is automatically stamped as an event. The user doesn't
have to stamp it. It seems that you're confusing with a received
email that is itself an reply to an invite.
In this case the email that is received in Chandler is a reply to an
invite. The event details are copied in the notes field and user can
then stamp it as event or task if they want to.
I'll correct the wording in the test case.
Recurrence Test Spec
http://svn.osafoundation.org/docs/trunk/testspecs/rel0_7/
Recurrence-0.7-testspec.html
Very complete but it's somewhat tedious to read that flattened out
list while it looks like a series of 3 (or so...) nested loops of
tests. Think about a scheme to "factorize" the test cases so that
the plan is easier to read and maintain.
Triage Test Spec
http://svn.osafoundation.org/docs/trunk/testspecs/rel0_7/
Triage-0.7-testspec.html
Good. I think you'll benefit from coming to this afternoon (Tuesday
Jan 30th) Design meeting since we're going to go over those cases
among other things.
Cheers,
- Philippe
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
