Thanks much, Dan...and I (and I'm sure all of us) your thorough checkpoint testing coverage.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:44:20 -0800, "Dan Steinicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This has been reported as bug 8139. When you use the end user install > it reproduces as Andre reported. > > Thanks Andre. I appreciate your bug reports very much. > > Dan > > https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8139 > > Dan Steinicke wrote: > > Redundant at this point but FWIW I did try to reproduce this on winXP > > r13188 and was unable to. > > > > Dan > > > > Andi Vajda wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Grant Baillie wrote: > >> > >>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Andre Mueninghoff wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> FYI...saw this traceback on an empty new repository on WinXP using > >>>>> r13188. Sorry, don't have time to log a bug at the moment. > >>>> > >>>> Did you run 'make distclean', followed by 'make' ? > >>> > >>> I was about to say that, too! > >>> > >>> However, I should also say that users will run into this problem if > >>> we're going to ship Chandler without plugins, we'll need to remove > >>> (or handle) "backwards" dependencies like this (where the app is > >>> depending on a plugin and not vice-versa). > >> > >> Most definitely, this is work in progress... > >> > >> Andi.. > >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > >> > >> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list > >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > > > Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list > > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev -- Andre Mueninghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
