On 24 May, 2007, at 15:16, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 02:58 PM 5/24/2007 -0700, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Morgen Sagen wrote:
> #3 feels like the right thing to do. One suggestion is to
encode all
> non-allowed by XML characters using %XX where the XX are hex
digits.
> Should we take that route?
I said this on IRC, posting here to keep everyone in the loop.
I think characters not allowed should be encoded with the standard
XML
way, for example ©.
Characters that are not allowed can't be encoded in this way -
that's what it means that they're not allowed. The resulting XML
is not well-formed, by definition.
In XML 1.1, those characters are merely "Restricted" ... the grammar
seems to have changed some. I think that's the reasoning behind the
summarization in <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200701/
msg00011.html>:
1-1F except CR, TAB, NL:
Can't occur in XML 1.0. Can occur in XML 1.1 and must be escaped.
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
