I think the issue is that everything is on the wiki, the landing
page, the license file, the known bugs. If the user doesn't have
internet access, they won't see any of that. I was initially just
going to keep these files very short but Katie brought up this issue
so I just wanted to take it to the list to see if people thought it
was something we should be addressing.
On Jul 3, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Philippe Bossut wrote:
Sheila Mooney wrote:
Once again, I am tasked with updating these files for Preview. I
wanted to see if people thought we should simply keep this brief
(like we have before) or consider adding more content in this file
ie: description of product features and perhaps copying some
content from the landing page in case people don't have internet
access and can't get at the link. If we were to provide more info,
what else should we consider putting in this file?
I vote to keep it real short as we did in the past. All a README
should have is info to bootstrap a user from a downloaded bundle to
a running app. i.e., how to install and how to run first time.
Having pointers for more info (to the site) is good. Avoiding
duplicating info will avoid inconsistency and production headaches.
The only thing I would add is a reminder to open the Relnote file
for futher last minute information (known bugs mostly) and a
pointer to the license file.
Cheers,
- Philippe
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
