Hear, hear. I would especially like to hear more about how Grant
works with svk. Or perhaps I should just search back in the mail
archives for when he talked about it before.
+1 on s3 btw. I can see printing being on a branch.
Reid
On Sep 10, 2007, at 17:50, Philippe Bossut wrote:
Hi again,
One thing I forgot to ask: the counter point to creating lots of
branches under SVN is that they are hard to work with/manage. Since
most devs will have 2 branches now, this is something to ponder.
In the past year though, some of you (Morgen, Jeffrey, Andi, Grant)
have had experience with developing on branches and developed a set
of "best practices" to make it work (daily trunk merge for instance).
Would be great if you guys could share these experience here for
the benefit of all so that everyone understand what developing with
branches on SVN is all about.
Cheers,
- Philippe
Grant Baillie wrote:
There's an s3 here:
- Stable trunk (i.e. 0.7.x work) + per-feature (and/or per-
developer) branches. This is essentially how twisted does things
IIRC.
Personally, I don't have a particularly strong opinion about this
choice. For example, no-one is singing the praises of s2, but I'd
be fine with it. (Using SVK, it's not a big deal to merge properly
between branches. My pattern is to make local branches often anyway).
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
