On 10 Sep, 2007, at 15:33, Reid Ellis wrote:
Hear, hear. I would especially like to hear more about how Grant
works with svk. Or perhaps I should just search back in the mail
archives for when he talked about it before.
I think what you'll find is a link to the wiki page where I wrote it
all up:
<http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/GrantBaillieSvkNotes>
Cheers,
--Grant
+1 on s3 btw. I can see printing being on a branch.
Reid
On Sep 10, 2007, at 17:50, Philippe Bossut wrote:
Hi again,
One thing I forgot to ask: the counter point to creating lots of
branches under SVN is that they are hard to work with/manage.
Since most devs will have 2 branches now, this is something to
ponder.
In the past year though, some of you (Morgen, Jeffrey, Andi,
Grant) have had experience with developing on branches and
developed a set of "best practices" to make it work (daily trunk
merge for instance).
Would be great if you guys could share these experience here for
the benefit of all so that everyone understand what developing
with branches on SVN is all about.
Cheers,
- Philippe
Grant Baillie wrote:
There's an s3 here:
- Stable trunk (i.e. 0.7.x work) + per-feature (and/or per-
developer) branches. This is essentially how twisted does things
IIRC.
Personally, I don't have a particularly strong opinion about this
choice. For example, no-one is singing the praises of s2, but I'd
be fine with it. (Using SVK, it's not a big deal to merge
properly between branches. My pattern is to make local branches
often anyway).
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
