Hi Grant, > I'm fine with the patch ... having the functionality spread out into > separate functions seems better.
Cool. > One question: What is the plan for localization of the quick entry > field? So far as I can tell, the new code requires "/event" etc, even in > foreign languages (since it uses the entry point name as the command name). Ouch, there is no plan. But it'd be easy to tweak the code to have quick_entry entry_points point to a dictionary of localized name:function pairs. Sincerely, Jeffrey _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
