Ok... just got back in town and starting to go through a week of
email and hit this list first. I'll check out Design next. :)
At 04:43 PM 10/22/2007 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
All of the discussions about this are happening on the design and
chandler-users lists...
Cheers,
Katie
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 11:51 AM 10/16/2007 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
I am concerned that the architecture project takes resources away
from iterating on the dashboard/triage features, as we need to
prove/disprove whether or not these features are going to be
compelling to people.
If we are changing the dashboard/triage model, it would be good to
know about it sooner, rather than later, as the design for that is
central to the domain model in the pilot project (aka APP for short?).
So, if we have an idea of what the model is changing to, or what
the likely alternatives are, it would be good to know so we can
validate the current plan. It is in fact the piece we were
planning to build *first* (along with recurrence).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
