A checkpoint build should also get it's own tag - the non-trunk builds
all rely on tags.
On Jan 22, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Jared Rhine wrote:
Jared, were you going to go ahead and try a Chandler Desktop
checkpoint build? I'd be more than happy to try it myself, in which
case you should contact me out-of-band regarding ssh access.
I've now run the build on Linux (alanui). As the build script
requires an svn tag, I wasn't able to kick off a 0.7.4 branch as no
tag has yet been made.
I suggest these next steps:
* Confirm tinderbox is green
* Grant or other committer tags a 0.7.4-rc1 from branches/0.7.4 and
updates version.py
* Jared kicks off RC1 builds on:
- alanui (Ubuntu Dapper)
- hilo (WinXP)
- ahukini (OS X 10.3 PPC)
- dev-imac1 (OS X 10.4 Intel)
* Jared copies resulting files onto builds.osafoundation.org for
internal basic validation (do the packages install/start)
* If the distro packages work, Jared updates
downloads.osafoundation.org like a normal RC release
We can also look at making a snapshot or milestone build instead. I
don't think our process or quality will be negatively impacted if we
go straight to RC1 as we'll be testing that a reasonable amount.
Bear, can you check the host list above? Is the proper list larger
or different?
alanui is not on the list for new builds - you need to use the Ubuntu
Gutsy tbox.
ahukini should be a Tiger box (10.4.*)
you need to add dev-imac3 - the Leopard Intel tbox
--
bear
Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osafoundation.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://code-bear.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
