What shall we do with the performance tinderboxen?

The previous owner, Heikki Toivonen, told me offline that he's not interested in maintained them. It's nifty functionality, but it seems like it takes some dedicated time to watch, report, investigate problems. I can't personally doing a good job with that given other responsibilities. From a systems side, shutting them off would save the power, KVM slots, and maintenance. The room the performance tinderbox are in needs to be emptied and right now I don't have a physical place to put them.

So I propose shutting off the performance tinderbox.

To keep them on, we'd need to find a willing volunteer to maintain them and also we'd need to find a physical/network home for them.

-- Jared

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to