osaf-notices is useful because commit messages and other automated
information goes there. Then again, those messages are infrequent
enough that you could just have them spit into #chandler instead.
Reid
On Jan 25, 2008, at 13:21, Sheila Mooney wrote:
Per Katie's email about the list consolidation, I am taking this
discussion to the chandler-dev list which will now handle these
types of issues.
Due to the reduction in staff, it's probably worthwhile revisiting
the irc channels we are currently using to see if there are any that
we want to get rid of. Here is the beginning of a proposal.
+ Keep both the chandler and cosmo channels. I think it's work
keeping both of these since much of the conversations are very
product specific/technical details etc. It makes sense for everyone
to be subscribed to both channels.
+ We can get rid of the osaf channel. Similarly to the list
proposal, higher level project discussions can just happen in the
chandler channel.
+ We should probably keep the osaf-staff channel.
+ There are a few other channels like osaf-qa, osaf-notices(?). I
propose we just get rid of these.
Suggestions, comments? Are there any other channels I am forgetting?
Cheers,
Sheila
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
