At <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/2008-December/0104 46.html>:
> multi-language, single-page ... multi-lingual versions of content in Twiki At <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/2008-December/0104 47.html>: > As TWiki is used for Chandler Project and other OSAF wikis: > > * might the recent news impact in any way on plans for development of the > wiki? In recent months on chandler-users there have been various expressions of interest re: translation. Most recently, <http://n2.nabble.com/-tp2931809p2935136.html>: > Packages with lots of security holes in the past are likely to have > lots of security holes in the future. TWiki is in the same category. Is the long term plan to continue with TWiki? My reason for asking: Plone could be much better suited to multi-lingual content. (You may not think of Plone as a wiki, but it's easily configured to behave comparably.) Whilst a transition from TWiki to Plone may be non-trivial, the long-term benefits could be great. Thoughts? Regards Graham _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
