(I'm just another Chandler user)
Actually, this makes good sense. The triage facility, to me, is what
makes Chandler unique - and having to think about it has made me realise
that the initial state of a note should be deferred (later), rather than
active (now) - and Gabriel's preferred sequence would reinforce an
effective way of dealing with things,
Chas
Gabriel Sbodio wrote:
Hello,
first i want to congratulate the Chandler's team for this helpfull
software.
i noticed that the order of the labels aren't really good for me.
i explain: when a task is deferred the next step is setting it as
active, but i need to clic twice to set it as active, and after being
active a task is done, two clic are needed to set it as.
So the loop of status is : deferred => done => active => deferred ......
Is it possible to change this loop as : deferred => active => done =>
deferred ??
It isn't really a bug, but the use of chandler will be faster and
easiest in my advice.
Thanks a lot and sorry for my bad english (i'm french).
_______________________________________________
chandler-users@osafoundation.org mailing list
unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users
Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
chandler-users@osafoundation.org mailing list
unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users
Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
