They probably had complete analysis documentation before starting to code? Then full set of test docs? Maybe they tried formal verification? /Erling
Raul Miller <[email protected]> skrev: >I was pointed at >http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/listings/Comanche055/CSM_GEOMETRY.agc.html >today. > >That's probably worth studying, as an artifact of what maintainable >code looks like. The underlying feat (putting people on the moon) has >not been equaled since then. > >That said, it's quite possible that modern computational artifacts >(such as video codecs, or whatever) are comparably readable (or >unreadable - depending on the patience and interests of the reader). > >Thanks, > >-- >Raul >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
