I think it's up to us. The J interpreter has been released as open source. If someone wants to sponsor development, that's one thing. But the community surrounding J is a big priority, and to some degree that makes it our responsibility.
(Which is why I was curious about your interest.) Thanks, -- Raul On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Jon Hough <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, it was more a question of what plans were. I wasn't making a request > or a demand. I am just interested to know. > > --- Original Message --- > > From: "Raul Miller" <[email protected]> > Sent: August 8, 2014 2:03 PM > To: "Chat forum" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Jchat] Future direction of J > > Would you like to implement either of those features? > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Jon Hough <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have been wondering recently what features J software has in the > > pipeline, or planning stages for J. > > For example, is there a plan to add multithreading to J? Or building > > executables? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
