This is probably not a 'proof' in the strict sense ...

Assuming (x) and (y) being of different size and not unit:

Looking at (x*y) geometrically, the product gets interpreted as a rectangle of width (y) and height (x); one will be able to construct a square -similar in area- with side length (a) and area (a^2) by taking the geometric mean a = sqrt(x*y).

The area measure will be totally arbitrary without a reference of side (a) to a unit length.

To make the transition from area to corresponding length one needs to count: so much amount of area (some number) translates to the same amount (same number) of of length. And for counting, one needs a unit; so many units of area translate to the same number of units of length.

-M

At 2016-07-14 17:19, you wrote:

Given line segments x and y, construct (using compass and straight edge)
line segments having the following values:

x+y
x-y
x*y
x%y

The first two are immediate.  I have proven that x%y is impossible if you
are not given a reference length 1 (or some other reference length from
which to construct 1).

The problem is, prove or disprove that you construct x*y without using 1.
 (Constructing x*y and x%y _with_ 1 are pretty easy.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to