Sorry, Martin, I don't understand your comments. Are you saying you _can_ construct x%y _without_ using 1?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 4:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Roger! > > RKWH> At that time a fellow freshman Norman (who went on to get a Ph.D. at > MIT) > RKWH> argued, for x%y, that there must be a 1 and then did the > construction for > RKWH> x%y using 1. I recall he said "there must be a 1" in the sense of > "it has > RKWH> to exist" rather than in the sense that "you have to use a 1 in the > RKWH> construction" or "you can not construct x%y without using 1". > > The x%y becomes solvable without normalizing on 1 when you, while posting > the problem, *flip* the email once before connnecting the mailing-list > footers... > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ... back to the mail header. Compass North is everywhere on a Moebius > Mail! > > Martin > > It's no coincidence I know about this trick: > > I just had to spend the hours between 1am and 7am on debugging a > yahoo-dkim-vs-mailman problem for a local computer club fellow. > Mailman list mails (such as all the J forum mails) *do* indeed > go through very similar contortions. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
