Raul said:
>  This reminds me that 90, in French, is quatre-vingt-dix which
> translates into J as (4*20)+10

Swiss French is unorthodox in the Francophone world because it has
decimalish words for 70, 80, and 90: septant, octante, nonante.

http://www.languagesandnumbers.com/how-to-count-in-french-switzerland/en/fra-che/


On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:38 PM, 'Bo Jacoby' via Chat <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I do not "bother other people with peculiarities which hinders them to
> start at 0", but (as everybody else) I do distinguish between cardinal
> numbers (including 0) and ordinal numbers (starting at "first"). An age is
> a cardinal number, and a year number is an ordinal number. You are
> perfectly free to disbelieve me when I tell you that learning ordinal
> fractions is worth your while. I am no missionary. That ordinal fraction
> theory "is grossly neglected since 1986"  is no admission nor apology, but
> merely information.
>
>     Den 16:44 fredag den 1. juni 2018 skrev R.E. Boss <
> [email protected]>:
>
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chat <[email protected]> On Behalf Of PR PackRat
> > Sent: vrijdag 1 juni 2018 02:00
> (...)
> > If it's really true that the current decade starts at the beginning of
> 2010, then
> > the first decade of the modern era (A.D., C.E.) has only 9 years in its
> > "decade"--1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 (because there's no year 0).
> > Using your logic, the second decade, of course, would then have 10
> years--
> > 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19.  And so on.  This was the same logic
> used by
> > those who celebrated the new millenium on 1/1/2000 rather than on
> > 1/1/2001.
> >
> > If all decades actually have 10 years (rather than 9 years for the first
> one),
> > then the end of that first decade (which starts with year 1, not a
> nonexistent
> > year 0) is the end of the 10th year.  (Obviously, all 10th years
> terminate with a
> > zero because all multiples of 10 terminate with a zero.)  Hence, the
> decade
> > previous to the current one ended at the conclusion of the year 2010.
> The
> > current decade (based from the beginning of the modern era) is 2011 to
> > 2020.
>
> We use the decimal natural/real number system to indicate years, weeks,
> daynumbers (in a month), hours, minutes and seconds.
> We use dedicated names for months and weekdays, and we start weeks and
> daynumbers with 1, and hours, minutes and seconds with 0 (although midnight
> is also denoted by 24 0 0.000).
> The dedicated names for months and days and the numbering of months, weeks
> and days starting at 1, we thank the Romans, who were unaware of the 0.
> (As I am told in Japan the use different dedicated names for any object
> which occur in different numbers.)
>
> Only for the numbering of the years we have some disagreement since people
> were fiddling around with that number a few(?) times, and under Christian
> influence we adopted long ago the AC/BC adjustment (actually, for that you
> should have the birthday of Christ to be the first day of the first year).
> But since long this is only important for historians or other people who
> want to express ancients dates.
> So don't tell me that "Christ was 2017 years old  in 2018" - probably not,
> after all adjustments made - or that "the first decade has only 9 years,
> since there is no year 0".
> IMO there is definitely a year 0, and whether Christ was born in that
> year, or not, I don't care?
>
> Don't bother other people with peculiarities which hinders them to start
> at 0, what everyone does in handling other scales: weight, time(<1 day),
> distance, frequency, etc.
> And if Jacoby has developed a system with an unfamiliar role for the 0 and
> which is grossly neglected since 1986, as he admits, he should try to find
> better arguments to make his system accepted, than the age of Christ.
>
>
> R.E. Boss
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 

Devon McCormick, CFA

Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to