Sorry, Donna & Greg, off-topic. I didn't want to start a disputation about climate science per-se. If I didn't make that clear, I'm really sorry.
This thread's for mathematical modelling with sufficiently transparent and trusty software; TABULA in particular; plus suggestions for how to provide assurance that it is to be trusted. Or alternatively, establish that it isn't. Then there's how much trust to place in the model itself, but that's a different issue -- a colossal one. Maybe that needs a thread of its own too. Except that the 11 built-in models are part of the TABULA release, so maybe we need some assurance about those, or at least a clear statement of their assumptions and limitations. On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 23:35, Donna Y <[email protected]> wrote: > > The ocean acts as a carbon sink and covers 71% of the earth’s surface > (and is 270 times greater in mass than the atmosphere > > > > coastline is extensive enough to wrap around the earth almost fifteen > times (372,000 miles!). The study found that annually, such ecosystems > could trap and store 2 to 35 times more carbon than even ocean phytoplankton > > Donna Y > [email protected] > > > > On Jun 7, 2019, at 2:28 PM, greg heil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If good/cheap/big/fast carbon sinks are up for discussion i would > recommend phytoplankton... Salmon are tasty too, but that is a side dish. > > > > > https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/24/18273198/climate-change-russ-george-unilateral-geoengineering > < > https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/24/18273198/climate-change-russ-george-unilateral-geoengineering > > > > > > ~greg > > http://krsnada <http://krsnadas.org/> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
