On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:03 PM Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > That is why the claim, > > > > > In other words if we could solve problems whose complexity grows > > > > exponentially, then EMH would be true. Since we can't, we can at least > > > > classify EMH as not always being useful in the general case. > > Does not make any sense to me despite the expounding below (even assuming > that the claim "if we could solve problems whose complexity grows > exponentially, then EMH would be true" holds, which I regard as very > misleading),
Yeah, that carries a lot of assumptions with it. It's difficult to talk about mathematical statements which are inconsistent, in a consistent fashion. Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
