On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 7:53 PM Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > Raul wrote, > > Significant SAT-3 problems involve more than clause. > > What happened? According to your favorite paper,
Somehow what I posted was not what I intended to say. I intended to say: "Significant SAT-3 problems involve more than one clause." By leaving out the word *one*, I left my sentence open to an interpretation which had little or nothing to do with my intended meaning. (Sorry about that.) ((Honestly, though, I am surprised that you were not already aware of this aspect of SAT-3. How could SAT-3 have an equivalence to SAT-n without multiple clauses?)) Anyways, hopefully, this time I am posting what I intend to say... Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
