On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Sam Joseph wrote:

> Tavin Cole wrote:
> 
> > > What is it with this?  Are you telling me that I couldn't set up a
> P2P
> > > network that stored cryptographically hashed content and did routing
> 
> > > like freenet, but where the nodes blocked input of non
> natural-language
> > > text files?
> 
> > You could do this, but it would obviously mean the nodes would be
> dealing
> > with unencrypted files.
> 
> I don't think so.  The interface for entering the files would screen out
> things that weren't natural language, and then encrypt the files before
> storage.
> 
> If the files are thus encrypted the system can be as secure as Freenet
> is now, right?

And if your system is open-source (which it would have to be to be
remotely secure) someone just writes a non-filtering client. Since
everything has to be encrypted before going out into the net, it can't be
filtered anywhere but at the inserting client, so you're screwed anyway.
See, it's completely infeasible!
-- 
    __                        __
   /  )                      /  )
  /--/ __.  __  ________    /  / __. , __o  _  _
 /  (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / / <_  /__/_(_/|_\/ <__</_/_)_


_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Reply via email to