"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde, > we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible, > especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs. Why is it that this needs to be done? Why cannot Freenet 0.4 remain compatible with existing content? -- John _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
- [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content David McNab
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content John Goerzen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content John Goerzen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content Greg Wooledge
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content John Goerzen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content David McNab
