"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde,
> we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible,
> especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.

Why is it that this needs to be done?  Why cannot Freenet 0.4 remain
compatible with existing content?

-- John

_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Reply via email to