John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4?
> "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a Concorde,
>> we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as possible,
>> especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.
>
> Why is it that this needs to be done? Why cannot Freenet 0.4 remain
> compatible with existing content?
>
> -- John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org
#include <std_disclaimer.h> GnuPG key 0x8A1D9A1F from www.complete.org/key
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
