Yodel is to a large degree pseudonymous. We can hold pseudonymous people
accountable to a degree. But as I have explained in my other email, the
traditional model of banking is _not the only way to do it_. A
distributed model can work well enough - even without coinage, virtual
or otherwise.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:01:21AM +0000, Polecat wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Both parties can't be simultaneously anonymous.
> 
> Consider that Yodel bank has an IP address, founders, maintainers,
> administrators, controllers.  All of these people can be found with
> minimal effort from the state, even in our current governments.  Yodel,
> and other "anonymous" banks, have the weakness that the bank itself is
> not anonymous.  It can't be anonymous.  If it were anonymous, you would
> send your money to it, and then it would evaporate and you'd never see
> your money again.
> 
> Accountability, anonymity, they don't mix.
> 
> Now, that doesn't rule out an anonymous bank.  It is technically
> possible to have an anonymous bank.  In fact to a degree, most paper
> currency is an anonymous bank.  But even bills have serial numbers, and
> the problem with Yodel and such is, once they started succeeding, to
> protect their interests the corporates would require under pain of law
> that the bank, and all banks, keep track of their money.
> 
> So, what if someone uses a Yodel account /as/ a bank?  Well that doesn't
> work either, because if Yodel gets wind that Yodel2 is not keeping
> records, serial numbers, etc, then Yodel2's account will be frozen under
> pain of law, because the original Yodel will be forced to do so by the
> authorities.
> 
> It's a chicken and egg problem.  Supposing two anonymous people want to
> transact. One has a transmittable product. The other has anonymous
> e-cash.  Who sends their end of the bargain first?  That's why we cannot
> hold anonymous people accountable, and therefore cannot participate in
> transactions of money.
> - --
> polecat - get in touch with your primal ferret
> pgp key at http://polecat.i2p/polecat.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDTf7T9lD1iiB3dSsRAimbAKCheFD/GyPnsSmzIfEEHgP7voY20QCeJzOi
> 9i8Ycjc+lQbVTFW8diVqF2s=
> =OVY9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> i2p mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dev.i2p.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
i2p mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dev.i2p.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p
_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to